1929 · CLOSE READING
Confessions of Aleister Crowley
Confessions of Aleister Crowley (1929), PDF p. 60
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
60
At that time I was bent on learning the outside forward loop, which involves raising the unemployed
leg very high until you discover the knack. Absorbed in this labour I failed to observe the Duke of
Orleans, a glaring girl on either arm. He swerved, swanking, out of the ruck and collided with me.
We both sat down very hard, but I on the point of his skate to the detriment of my much prized
perineum. Being then a perfect young fool, as I am now a perfect old one, I supposed it incumbent
on my race and caste to pretend not to be hurt, so I forced myself to go on skating despite agony so
great that I could hardly bite back the tears, until I thought I had done enough for honour and felt
free to slip away. I was engaged that night to a committee meeting of the Climbing Club at the
rooms of H. V. Reade in Jermyn Street. I managed somehow to sit through the meeting, the matter
being made worse by my insane bashfulness which prevented me asking my host to let me use his
bedroom. We proceeded to a restaurant to dinner, but there I broke down and excused myself.
The rest of the evening's entertainment remains a mystery. I have a vague memory of being
stretched on the seat of a railway carriage and I learned later that I had reached home, some six
miles from London, soaked to the skin. I suppose I must have wandered about in the rain for an
indefinite period, in pain too great to know what I was doing except to try to be brave. The blow
had set up cystitis which kept me in bed for the next three weeks. The inflammation gradually
disappeared after spreading to the prostate gland and the urethra. Nor was that the end of the
trouble. The urethritis caused a discharge which proved very refractory to treatment and ultimately
determined a triple stricture for which I am being treated at the moment of dictating this paragraph
more than a quarter of a century after the accident. The moral is, of course, to avoid the Bourbons,
though, as the duke is reported to be dying at the present moment, it is quite possible that his
physician is shaking his head wisely and saying, "Ah, Your Highness, this is what comes from getting
mixed up with people like Aleister Crowley! ..."
{117}
The very streets testify against the city. On the one hand we have pale stunted hurrying pygmies
jostling each other in the bitter search for bread; an ant heap is a miracle of beauty and dignity in
comparison. On the other, when it comes to excitement or amusement, we see perspiring brutes
belching the fumes of beer; course, ugly parodies of apes. Nature affords no parallel to their
degradation. There is no open air life, physical or mental, and there is the ever-abiding sense of sin
and shame to obsess these slaves. Nowhere, except in English cities, do these conditions exist. Slum
life there is elsewhere, and misery enough; pitiful struggle, monstrous greed and triumphant
brutality. But only in England are the people poisoned through and through; elsewhere there is a
sense of independence even in the most servile. The Russian mujik is in his way an aristocrat.
And the cause of all these phenomena is one and the same. It is the Anglo-Saxon conception of
Christianity which pollutes the race. Only the wellfed pagen, whether he be a bishop or a
bookmaker, is exempt, because he either does not take religion seriously or takes it individually
without reference to his neighbour. The most bigoted members of the Greek and Roman
communions of the Continent, though they may feel their religion passionately and make it the
mainspring of their lives, are not bound together by that insect-like collective consciousness which
stamps the Anglo-Saxon. The English pagan is in nine cases out of ten a Norman or a Celt. He has
the aristocratic consciousness, whatever he may tell you about his religious opinions. Now it is all
very well to be one of the master class and smile contemptuously while bowing the knee in the
temple of Rimmon, but a poet cannot be content with the situation. Hence the most intensely
aristocratic types, like Shelley and Byron, instead of acquiescing in the social system which made
them superiors, felt with acute agony the degradation of the slaves among whom they moved, and
became revolutionaries and exiles because they could not endure to live in such a degraded
community.
Certain classes in England possess manliness and self-respect. As a rule they are connected with
sport and agriculture, or are skilled workmen. The essence of aristocracy is to take a pride in being
what you are, whatever that may be. There is no room for this in industrialism and the result is that
one can watch a London thoroughfare for hours without even seeing an individual whose nonentity is
not repulsive. Everyone who possesses natural advantages has got out of the ruck and takes very
good care to avoid further contamination. Such people lead lives of artificial seclusion. It is part of
their Freudian protection to become unconscious of the mob. But it is the business of the poet to
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 5ef44b98d8f9c4af5f6f86e1:p00060
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.