Thelema ScholarTHE ALEISTER CROWLEY COLLECTION
FOLLOW A WORD THROUGH THE COLLECTION

Search the corpus.

Phrase search ignores case and repeated whitespace. All-words search finds whole words anywhere on the same page. OCR errors can affect results.

4 matching pages

Page 1 of 1
1924 · PDF PAGE 2

An Open Letter to Lord Beaverbook

…he Sunday Express of November 26, 1922, the following appears :— ALEISTER CROWLEY’S ORGIES IN SICILY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WOMEN VICTIMS Three women he keeps there perman- ently for his orgies. All of them he brought from America two or three years ago. One is a French-American gover- ness, one is an ex-schoolmistress, and one a cinema actress from Los Angeles. — 2 —

original embedded textRead original & transcription →
1924 · PDF PAGE 15

An Open Letter to Lord Beaverbook

…his cad, backed by your wealth, should have the licence to publish to the whole world filthy libels against the personal virtue of noble women. A Baron of England, accessory after the fact to so foul and mean a crime ? I have the honour to be, Your Lordship’s obedient servant, Norman MUDD, M.A., Cambridge : sometime Scholar of Trinity College. Late Lecturer in Applied Mathematics, Grey University College, South Africa. 37a Tressilian Road, Brockley, London, S.E.4, August, 1924. — 15 —

original embedded textRead original & transcription →
1924 · PDF PAGE 1

An Open Letter to Lord Beaverbook

…gainst the social honour, life, and work of an English gentleman and man of letters, and against the personal virtue of three very noble women who have renounced their private ambitions in order to help in his work. I. The case is as follows :— Between November 1922 and March 1923, the Sunday Express published a series of sensa- — I —

original embedded textRead original & transcription →
1924 · PDF PAGE 3

An Open Letter to Lord Beaverbook

…or procuring young girls for a similar purpose. Both statements are absolute lies. The first falsely and wantonly accuses identifi- able women of being enslaved prostitutes. The second falsely and wantonly accuses a well-known man of letters of being a proved felon. Taken together, they show that anonymous scoundrels, backed by the resources of a great newspaper organisation, can—in fact, as distinct from legal fiction—freely direct, against any man or woman who happens to be socially ill-protected, an unscrupulously untrue and in- decent campa…

original embedded textRead original & transcription →