1954 · CLOSE READING
Magick Without Tears
Magick Without Tears (1954), PDF p. 268
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
THE TAO (2)
235
As for TO ON, which superficially might seem the best
translation of Tao as described in the text , it is the most
misleading of the three . For TO ON possesses an extensive
connotation implying a whole system of Platonic concepts,
than which nothing can be more alien to the essential quality
of the Tao. Tao is neither 'being' nor 'not being' in any sense
which Europe could understand. It is neither existence , nor a
condition or form of existence . Equally, TO MH ON gives no
idea of Tao. Tao is altogether alien to all that class of
thought. From its connection with "that principle which
necessarily underlies the fact that events occur" one might
suppose that the "Becoming" of Heraclitus might assist us to
describe the Tao. But the Tao is not a principle at all of that
kind. To understand it requires an altogether different state
of mind to any with which European thinkers in general are
familiar. It is necessary to pursue unflinchingly the path of
spiritual development on the lines indicated by the Sufis, the
Hindus, and the Buddhists ; and , having reached the trance
called Nerodha-Sammapati , in which are destroyed all forms
soever of consciousness, there appears in that abyss of
annihilation the germ of an entirely new type of idea, whose
principal characteristic is this: that the entire concatenation
of One's previous experiences and conceptions could not
have happened at all, save by virtue of this indescribable
necessity.
I am only too painfully aware that the above exposition is
faulty in every respect. In particular , it presupposes in the
reader
considerable familiarity with the subject, thus
practically begging the question. It must also prove almost
wholly unintelligible to the average reader, him in fact whom
I especially aim to interest .
For his sake I will try to elucidate the matter by an
analogy. Consider electricity. It would be absurd to say that
electricity is any of the phenomena by which we know it. We
take refuge in the petitio principii of saying that electricity is
that form of energy which is the principal cause of such and
such phenomena. Suppose now that we eliminate this idea as
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: e7a83bd7c68d4e96894f9e69:p00268
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.