1954 · CLOSE READING
Magick Without Tears
Magick Without Tears (1954), PDF p. 137
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
104
MAGICK WITHOUT TEARS
From one point of view (bless your heart!) you are nothing
at all but a bundle of memories. When you say "this is
happening now," you are a falsifier of God's sacred truth!
When I say "I see a horse," the truth is that "I record in
those terms my private hieroglyphic interpretation of the
unknown and unknowable phenomenon (or 'point-event')
which has more or less recently taken place at the other end
of my system of receiving impressions."
Well, then! You realize, of course, how many millions or
billions of memories there must be to compose any average
well-trained mind. Those strings of adjectives all sprang
spontaneously; I did not look them up in books of reference;
so imagine the extent of my full vocabulary! And words are
but the half-baked bricks with which one constructs.
See to it, then, that you accept no worthless material; that
you select, and select again, always in proper order and
proportion; organize, structuralize your thought, always with
the one aim in view of accomplishing the Great Work.
Well, now, before going further into this, I must behave
like an utter cad, and disgrace my family tree, and blot my
'scutcheon
and my copybook by confusing you about
"realism." Excuse: not my muddle; it was made centuries ago
by a gang of cursed monks, headed by one Duns
Scotus-sQ-called
because he was Irish-or
if not by
somebody else equally objectionable . They held to the
Platonic dogma of archetypes. They maintained that there
was an original (divine) idea such as "greenness" or a "pig,"
and that a green pig, as observed in nature, was just one
example of these two ideal essences. They were opposed by
the "nominalists,"
who said, to the contrary,
that
"greenness" or "a pig" were nothing in themselves; they were
mere names (nominalism from Lat. nomen, a name) invented
for convenience
of grouping. This doctrine is plain
commonsense, and I shall waste no time in demolishing the
realists.
All a priori thinking, the worst kind of thinking, goes with
"realism" in this sense.
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: e7a83bd7c68d4e96894f9e69:p00137
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.