1904 · CLOSE READING
The Sword of Song
The Sword of Song (1904), PDF p. 114
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
SCIENCE AND BUDDHISM
107
survives death, what does it m
atter to us?
Why are we to be so altruistic as to avoid
the reincarnation of a being in all points
different from ourselves? As the small boy
said, “What has posterity
done for
me?”
But som ethin does persist;
something
changing, though less slowly . What evi-
dence have we after all that an anim al does
not remember his man-incarnation? Or, as
Levi says, “In the suns they
remember,
and in the planets they forget.” I think it
unlikely (may be), but in the total absence of
all evidence for or agains
t—at leas t with
regard to the latter hy pothesis !—I suspend
my judgement, leave the question alone, and
proceed to m ore practical points that are
offered by these interesting but not over-
useful metaphysical speculations.
V.
KARMA.
The Law of Causation is formally identical
with this. Karm
a m eans “ that which is
made,” and I think it should be considered
with strict etymological accuracy. If I place
a stone on the roof of a house,
it is sure to
fall sooner or later; i.e., as soon as the con-
ditions perm it. Also, in its ultim
ation, the
doctrine of Karm a is identical with
deter-
minism. On this subject much wisdom, with
an infinite amount of rubbish, has been
written. I therefore dismiss it in these few
words, confident that the established identity
can never be shaken.
VI.
THE TEN FETTERS OR SANYOGANAS.
1. Sakkay a-ditthi. Belief in a “soul.”
2. V ikikikkha.
Doubt.
3. Silabbata-parâ- Reliance on the effi-
mâsa
cacy of rites and
and ceremonies.
4. Kama. Bodily
Desires.
5. Patigha.
H
atred.
6. Ruparaga. Desire
for bodily
im
mortality.
7. Aruparaga.
Desire for spiritual
i
mmortality.
8. Mano. Pride.
9. Udha kka. Self-righteousness.
10. Avigga. Ignorance.
(1) For this is a petitio principii.
(2) This, to a
scientist, is apparently
anathema. But it only means, I think, that if
we are not settled in our m
inds we cannot
work. And this is unquestionable. Suppose
a chemist to set to work to determ
ine the
boiling-point of a new organic substance.
Does he stop in the midst, struck by
the
fear that his therm ometer is inaccurate ?
No ! he has, unless he is a fool, tested it
previously. We must have
our principia
fixed before we can do research work.
(3) A scientist hardly requires conviction
on this point!
(4) Do you think to combine Newton and
Caligula? The passions,
allowed to
dominate, interfere with the concentration of
the mind.
(5) Does brooding on y our dislikes help
you to accurate obs ervation? I admit that
a controversy may stir y ou up to perform
prodigies of work, but while y ou are actually
working you do not suffer the concentration
of your mind to be interfered with.
(6 & 7) This Fetter and the next are con-
tingent on your having perceived the suffer-
ing of all forms of conscious existence.
(8) Needs no com
ment.
Pride, like
humility, is a form of delusion.
(9) Is like unto it, but on the moral plane.
(10) The great enemy. Theists alone have
found the infamous audacity to extol the
merits of this badge of servitude.
We s ee, then, that in this
classification
a scientist will concur. W e need not d iscuss
the question whether or no he would
find
others to add. Buddhism may not be com-
plete, but, as far as it goes, it is accurate.
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: cdd842c2ae8f5d9753c40b33:p00114
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- legacy text differs review