1929 · CLOSE READING
Moonchild
Moonchild (1929), PDF p. 174
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
proceed to cook him, until he resembles seal. So you have a dyed rabbit-skin,
and you call it seal coney. But there are by-ways that stray further yet from
the narrow lane of truth. The increasing demand for rabbits has reduced the
profit on seal coney, and it becomes desirable to find a cheaper substitute.
Reckless of the susceptibilities of the ancient Egyptians, this is found in that
domesticated representative of the lion family which consoles our spinsters.
Having disguised the skin as far as may be, they next disguise the name;
some buyer must be made to pay the price of seal coney, and think that he is
getting it; so 'cat' becomes `trade seal coney' [245] — and unless one has the
whole story there is no possibility of derivation. The lie has become mere
misnomer."
"It is the general case of Anglo-Saxon hypocrisy," returned Simon Iff. "I
had an amusing example the other day in an article that I wrote for
theReview — rather prudish people. My little essay ended: `So Science offers
her virgin head to the caress of Magick.' The editor thought `virgin' rather a
`suggestive' word, and replaced it by 'maiden'."
"You remind me of a curate we had over at Grimthorpe Ambrose. 'Leg' has
for many years been a not quite proper word; when the terrible necessity of
referring to it arose, the polite ass replaced it by 'limb.'
"The refined sensibility of our curate perceived the indelicacy of saying
'limb,' since every one knew that it meant 'leg'; so he wrapped it up in the
decent obscurity of the Latin language, and declined to play croquet one
afternoon on the ground that, the day before, in visiting old Mrs.
Postlethwaite, he had severely strained his member."
"The wicked fall into the pit that they have digged," said Iff. "All this
applies to the question of magick. It is a question of debasing coinage. I have
great sympathy with the ascetics of India and their monkish imitators in
Europe. They held spiritual gifts to be of supreme value, and devoted their
lower powers to the development of the higher. Of course mistakes were
made; the principle was carried too far; they were silly enough to injure their
lower powers by undue fasting, flagellation, and even mutilation. They got
the false idea that the body was an enemy, whereas it is a servant — the only
servant available. But the idea was right; they wanted to exchange dross for
gold. Now the sorcerer [246] offers his gold for dross, tries to exchange his
highest powers for money or the gratification of envy or revenge. The
Christian Scientist, absurdly so-called, is a sorcerer of the basest type, for he
devotes the whole wealth of religion to the securing of his bodily health. It is
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ba1adb09e3af8d702fe24282:p00174
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.