1929 · CLOSE READING
Moonchild
Moonchild (1929), PDF p. 125
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
place for the operation gave rise to much mental labour. It is, generally
speaking, desirable to choose the locality of a recent battle; and the greater
the number of slain the better. (There should be some very desirable spots in
the vicinity of Verdun for black magicians who happen to flourish after the
vulgar year 1917). But the Grimoires were written in other times with other
manners; now-a-days there is risk of disturbance if one sets up one's
paraphernalia of goats and cats at a cross-roads, in the hope of helping
oneself out with a recently-interred suicide, or a ceremonially annihilated
vampire; where the peasant of the fourteenth century would have fled
shrieking, the motorist of the twentieth century stops to observe, or, more
likely, runs you over; so that unless your property includes a private
battlefield, it is a point of valour to choose a more retired site for one's
necromancy than the stricken field of the Marne. Cross-roads, again, are not
so thickly planted with suicides and vampires as in happier days. Reflecting
solidly and ably upon these points of modern degeneracy, Vesquit made up
his mind to compromise, and accept the most agreeable substitute, a profaned
chapel; it was easy to rent a villa with a chapel attached, and, to a man of
Vesquit's ability, the work of a moment to profane it.
This he accordingly arranged through Abdul Bey.
The mind of this youth was very forcibly impressed by the preparations of
the old coroner. He had been brought up in the modern school, and could
laugh at superstition with the best of us; but there were traces of hereditary
faith in Islam, and he was not sceptical enough to spoil the magic of Vesquit.
No man knew better than the necromancer that all this insane ceremonial
was irrational. But it [179] so happens that everything on this planet is,
ultimately, irrational; there is not, and cannot be, any reason for the causal
connexion of things, if only because our use of the word "reason" already
implies the idea of causal connexion. But, even if we avoid this fundamental
difficulty, Hume said that causal connexion was not merely unprovable, but
unthinkable; and, in shallower waters still, one cannot assign a true reason
why water should flow down hill, or sugar taste sweet in the mouth. Attempts
to explain these simple matters always progress into a learned lucidity, and
on further analysis retire to a remote stronghold where every thing is
irrational and unthinkable.
If you cut off a man's head, he dies. Why? Because it kills him. That is
really the whole answer. Learned excursions into anatomy and physiology
only beg the question; it does not explain why the heart is necessary to life to
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ba1adb09e3af8d702fe24282:p00125
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.