1913 · CLOSE READING
The Equinox (Volume I, Number IX)
The Equinox (Volume I, Number IX) (1913), PDF p. 437
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
THE KEY OF THE MYSTERIES
the expiation of the greatest crimes, since it was the conse-
quence of a sentence of death. The most wicked men, being
the most unhappy of all, seemed to him to offer the sublimest
of expiations to God. He broke all bounds in his attack on
all repression and all damnation. “A religion which damns,”
he cried, “is a damned religion!” He further preached the
most absolute licence under the pretext of charity, and so far
forgot himself as to say, that the most imperfect and the most
apparently reprehensible act of love was worth more than
the best of prayers. It was the Marquis de Sade turned
preacher!? Further, he denied the existence of the devil with
an enthusiasm often full of eloquence.
“Can you conceive,” said he, “a devil tolerated and
authorized by God? Can you conceive, further, a God who
made the devil, and who allowed him to ravage creatures
already so weak, and so prompt to deceive themselves! A
god of the devil, in short, abetted, protected, and scarcely
surpassed in his revenges, bya devil of a god!” The rest of
the pamphlet was of the same vigour. The Professor of
Magic was almost frightened, and inquired the address of Mr.
Madrolle. It was not without some trouble that he obtained
an interview with this singular pamphleteer, and here is,
more or less, their conversation:
Eurpnas Levi. “ Sir, I have received a pamphlet from you.
1 Quoted with approval in Solution of the First Problem, IX, p. 52.—O. M.
It is difficult to determine whether the words ‘act of love’ should be inter-
preted in their gross, or in their mystical, sense. Perhaps Madrolle was himself
intentionally ambiguous.—TRANS.
2 But the Marquis de Sade was, above all, a preacher. Three-fourths ot
Justine are verbose arguments in favour of so-called vice. Again Levi trips
in referring to an author whom he has not read.—TRANS.
139
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: b19b302fada611776d16b5bf:p00437
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.