1929 · CLOSE READING
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1)
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1) (1929), PDF p. 44
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
the référencé is usually not to the actual planets, but to parts of
the earth which are of the nature attributed to these planets. Thus,
when we say that Nakhiel is the “Intelligence” of the Sun, we do
not mean that he lives in the Sun, but only that he has a certain
rank and character; and although we can invoke hinij we do not
necessarily mean that he exists in the same sense of the Word in
which our butcher exists.
When we “conjure Nakhiel to visible appearance,” it may be
that our process resembles création — or, rather imagination —
more nearly than it does calling-forth. The aura of a man is
called the “magical mirror of the universe”; and, so far as any
one can tell, nothing exists outside of this mirror. It is at least
convenient to represent the whole as if it were subjective. It leads
to less confusion. And, as a man is a perfect microcosm,1 it is
perfectly easy to re-model one’s conception at any moment.
Now there is a traditional correspondance, which modem
experiment has shown to be fairly reliable. There is a
certain natural connexion between certain letters, words,
numbers, gestures, sliapes, perfumes and so on, so that
any idea or (as we might call it) “spirit”, may be com-
posed or called forth by the use of those things which are
harmonious with it, and express particular parts of its
nature. These correspondences hâve been elaborately mapped
in the Book 777 in a very convenient and compendious form. It
will be necessary for the student to make a careful study of this
book in connexion with some actual rituals of Magick, for example,
I. He is this only by définition. The universe may contain an infinité
variety of worlds inaccessible to human appréhension. Yet, for this very
reason, they do not exist for the purposes of the argument. Man has, how-
ever, some instruments of knowledge; we may, therefore, define the Macro-
cosm as the totality of things possible to his perception. As évolution deve-
lops those instruments, the Macrocosm and the Microcosm extend; but they
always maintain their mutual relation. Neither can possess any meaning
except in terrns o£ the other. Our ^d^^veries^ are exactly as much of
ourselves as they are of Nature. America and Electricity did, in a sense,
exist before we were aware of them; but they are even now no more than
incomplète ideas, expressed in symbolic terrns of a sériés of relations between
two sets of inscrutable phenomena.
8
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ada196c290adc6561dda8e9d:p00044
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.