1929 · CLOSE READING
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1)
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1) (1929), PDF p. 41
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
lions are symbolized in Mathematicg. “God is the Gréai
Arithmetician.” “God is the Grand Geomeler.” It is bèst
therefore to préparé lo apprehend Him by formula ting our
minds according to these measures. 1
lo return, each letter of this alphabet may hâve its spécial
magical sigil. The student must not expect to be given a cut-
and-dried définition of what exactly is meant by any of ali this.
On the contrary, he must work backwards, putting the whole of
his mental and moral outfit into these pigeon-holes. You would
not expect to be able to buy a filing cabinet with the names of ali
y our past, présent and future correspondents ready indexed: y our
cabinet has a System of letters and numbers meaningless in them-
selves, but ready to take on a meaning to you, as you fill up the
files. As your business increased, each letter and number would
receive fresh accessions of meaning for youj and by adopting this
orderly arrangement you would be able to hâve a much more
comprehensive grasp of your affairs than would otherwise be the
case. By the use of this System the magician is able
ultimately to unify the whole of his knowledge — to trans¬
mute, even on the Intellectual Plane, the Many into the
One.
*
The reader can now understand that the sketch given above
of the magical Hierarchy is hardly even an outline of the real
theory of the Universe. This theory may indeed be studied iii
the article already referred to in No. V of the Equinox, and, môre
deeply, in the Book of the Law and the Commentaries thereon:
but the true understanding dépends entirely upon the work of the
Magician himself. Without magical expérience it will be
meaningless.
In this there is nothing peculiar. It is so with ail scientific
knowledge. A blind man might cram up astronomy for the
purpose of passing examinations, but his knowledge would be
I. By “God” I here mean the Idéal Identity of a man’s inmost
nature. “Something ourseîves (I erase Arnold's imbécile and guilty ‘not’)
^that makes for righteousness; ” righteousness being rightly defined as
internai cohérence. (Internai Cohérence împlies that which is written
“Detegitur Yod.”)
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ada196c290adc6561dda8e9d:p00041
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.