1929 · CLOSE READING
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1)
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1) (1929), PDF p. 145
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
of himself with his sigil. It is apparently assumed that the spirit
already possesses the means of working on matter. The
conception seems to be that of a schoolboy who asks his father to
tell the butler to do something for him. In other words, the
theory is grossly animistic. The savage tribes described by Frazer
had a far more scientific theory. The same may be said of
witches, who appear to hâve been wiser than the thaumaturgists
who despised them. - They at least made waxen images — iden-
tified by baptism — of the people they wished to control. They
at least used appropriate bases for Magical manifestations, such
as blood and other vehicles of animal force, with those of
vegetable virtue such as herbs. They were also careful to put
their bewitched products into actual contact — material or astral
— with their victims. The classical exorcists, on the contrary, for
ail their learning, were careless about this essential condition.
They acted as stupidly as people who should Write business letters
and omit to post them.
It is not too much to say that this failure to understand the
conditions of success accounts for the discrédit into which Magick
fell until Eliphas Levi undertook the task of re-habilitating it two
générations ago. But even he (profoundly as he studied, and
luminously as he expounded, the nature of Magick considered as
a universal formula) paid no attention whatever to that question
of the Magical Link, though he everywhere implies that it is
essential to the Work. He evaded the question by making the
petitio principii of assigning to the Astral Light the power of
transmitting vibrations of ail kinds. He nowhere enters into
detail as to how its effects are produced. He does not inform us
as to the qualitative or quantitative laws of this light. (The
scientifically trained student will observe the analogy between
Levi’s postulate and that of ordinary science in re the luminiferous
ether.)
It is déplorable that nobody should hâve recorded in a syste-
matic form the results of our investigations of the Astral Light.
We hâve no account of its properties or of the laws which obtain
in its sphere. Yet these are sufficiently remarkable. We may
briefly notice that, in the Astral Light, two or more objects can
— 109 —
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ada196c290adc6561dda8e9d:p00145
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.