1929 · CLOSE READING
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1)
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1) (1929), PDF p. 118
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
To take a simple example, suppose that, in an Evocation of
Bartzabel, the planet Mars, whose sphere is Geburah (Severity)
were situated (actually, in the heavens) opposite to the Square of
Chesed (Mercy) of the Tau in the Circle, and the triangle placed
accordingly. It would be improper for the Magus to stand on
that Square unless using this formula, “I, frora Chesed, rule
Geburah through the Path of the Lion”; while — taking an
extreme case -— to stand on the square of Hod (which is naturally
dominated by Geburah) would be a madness which only a formula
of the very highest Magick could counteract.
Certain positions, however, such as Tiphareth *, are so sympa-
thetic to the Magus himself that he may use them without
reference to the nature of the spirit, or of the operation; unless
he requires an exceptionally précisé spirit free of ail extraneous
éléments, or one whose nature is difficultly compatible with
Tiphareth.
To show how these positions may be used in conjunction with
the spirals, suppose that you are invoking Hathor, Goddess of
Love, to descend upon the Altar. Standing on the square of
Netzach you will make your invocation to Her, and then dance an
inward spiral deosil ending at the foot of the altar, where you
sink on your knees with your arms raised above the altar as if
inviting Her embrace.1 2 3 *
To conclude, one may add that natural artistic ability, if you
possess it, forms an excellent guide. Ail Art is Magiek.
Isadora Duncan has this gift of gesture in a very high degree.
Let the reader study her dancing; if possible rather in private
then in public, and learn the superb “unconsciousness” — which
is magical consciousness — with which she suits the action to the
melody.8 T
There is no more potent means than Art of calling forth
true Gods to visible appearance.
1. Tiphareth is hardly “dominated” even by Kether. It is the son
rather than the servant.
2. But not “in supplication”.
3. This passage was written in 1911 e. v. “Wake Duncan with
thy Knocking? I would thou couldst!”
82 —
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ada196c290adc6561dda8e9d:p00118
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.