1930 · CLOSE READING
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 2)
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 2) (1930), PDF p. 58
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
assists the lesser characters to get out of themselves at the suprême
moment. Following the climax there should always be an unre-
hearsed ceremony, an impromptu. The most satisfactory form of
this is the dance. In such ceremonies appropnate libations may be
freely used.
The Rite of Luna (Equinox I. VI) is a good example of this
use. . Here the climax is the music of the goddess, the assistants
remaining in silent ecstasy.
In the rite of Jupiter the impromptu is the dance, in that of
Saturn long periods of silence.
It will be noticed that in these Rites poetry and music were
large!y employed mostly published pièces by well-known
authois and composers. It would be better 1 to Write and compose
specially for the ceremony 2.
(f ** PERHAPS ! One can think of certain Awful Conséquences”.
“But, after ail, they wouldn’t seem so to the authors! ” “But — pity the
poor Gods!” “Bother the Gods! ”
2. A bodv of skilled Magicians accustomed to work in concert may be
competent to conduct impromptu Orgia. To cite an actual instance in
recent times; the blood of a Christian being required for some purpose,
a young cock was procured and baptized into the Roman Catholic Church
by a man who, being the son of an ordained Priest, was magicaliy an
incarnation of the Being of that Priest, and was therefore congenitally
possessed of the powers thereto appurtenant. This cock, “Peter Paul,”
was consequently a baptized Christian for ail magical purposes. Order
was then taken to imprison the bird; which done, the Magicians assuming
respectively the characters of Herod, Herodias, Salome, and the Execu-
•tioner, acted out the scene of the dance and the beheading, on the lines of
Oscar Wilde’s drama, “Peter Paul” being cast for the part of John
the Baptist. This ceremony was devised and done on the spur of the
moment, and its spontaneity and simplicity were presumably potent factors
in its success.
On the point of theology, I doubt whether Dom Gorenflot sucessfully
avoided eating méat in Lent by baptizing the pullet a carp. For as the
sacrament — by its intention, despite its defects of form — could not fail
of efficacy, the pullet must hâve become a Christian, and therefore a human
being. Carp was therefore only its baptized name — cf. Polycarp — and
Dom Gorenflot ate human flesh in Lent, so that, for ail he became a
bishop, he is damned.
- 178 -
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 7225bbab6d2ac2a8268d8bdd:p00058
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.