Thelema ScholarTHE ALEISTER CROWLEY COLLECTION
← The Law is for All
1996 · CLOSE READING

The Law is for All

The Law is for All (1996), PDF p. 87

Original page

Enlarge ↗
Original scan of The Law is for All, PDF page 87

Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.

Transcription

Download text ↓
raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
88 The Law is for All He is “not extended”; that is, without condition of any sort in the metaphysical sense. Only in the highest trances can the nature of these truths be realized. It is indeed a supra-rational experience not dissimilar to those characteristic of the “Star-Sponge” Vision previously described1 that can help us here. The trouble is that the truth itself is unfitted to the dualistic reason of “normal” man­ kind. Hadit seems to be the principle of Motion which is every­ where, yet is not extended in any dimension except as it chances to combine with the “Matter” which is Nuit. There can evidently be no manifestation apart from this conjunction. A “Khabs” or Star is apparently any nucleus where this conjunction has taken place. The real philosophical difficulty about this cosmogony is not concerned with any particular equation, or even with the Original Equation. We can understand x = ab, x1 = a^b^ etc.; and also 0° = pa + qb, whether pa - qb = 0 or not. But we ask how the homogeneity of both Nuit and Hadit can ever lead to even the illusion of “difference.” The answer appears to be that this differ­ ence appears naturally with the self-realization of Nuit as the totality of possibilities; each of these, singly and in combination, is satisfied or set in motion by Hadit, to compose a particular manifestation. 0° could possess no signification at all, unless there were diverse dimensions wherein it had no extension. “Nothing” means nothing save from the point of view of “Two,” just as “Two” is monstrous unless it is seen as a mode of “Nothing.” 1 [See Chapter I, p. 79.] 2 [Hadit + Nuit = Ra-Hoor-Khuit.] The above explanation appears somewhat disingenuous, since there is no means whatever of distinguishing any Union H + N = R from another.1 2 We must postulate a further stage. R (Ra-Hoor-Khuit), Kether, Unity, is always itself; but we may suppose that a number of such homogeneous positive manifesta­ tions may form groups differing from each other as to size and structure so as to create the illusion of diversity.
Page provenance & review flags

Stable page ID: 6528ce4d28e01eb80a128d9c:p00087

Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.

Printed page label has not been verified.

  • No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.