1996 · CLOSE READING
The Law is for All
The Law is for All (1996), PDF p. 58
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
Chapter I a Verses 51—52
59
ness sets up the illusion of duality, which leads to excision and
destruction.
“direful”: because Ra-Hoor-Khuit is a “god of War and of
Vengeance”; see Cap. III.
The doctrine of the previous verses, which appears not merely
to allow sexual liberty in the ordinary sense, but even to advocate
it in a sense which is calculated to shock the most abandoned lib
ertine, can do no less than startle and alarm the magician, and
that only the more so as he is familiar with the theory and prac
tice of his art. “What is this, in the name of Adonai?” I hear him
exclaim: “is it not the immemorial and unchallenged tradition
that the exorcist who would apply himself to the most elementary
operations of our Art is bound to prepare himself by a course of
chastity? Is it not notorious that virginity is by its own virtue one
of the most powerful means, and one of the most essential condi
tions, of all Magical works? This is no question of technical for
mula such as may, with propriety, be modulated in the event of an
Equinox of the Gods. It is one of those eternal truths of Nature
which persist, no matter what the environment, in respect of place
or period.”
To these remarks I can but smile my most genial assent. The
only objection that I can take to them is to point out that the con
notation of the word “chastity” may have been misunderstood
from a scientific point of view, just as modern science has modi
fied our conception of the relations of the earth and the sun with
out presuming to alter one jot or tittle of the observed facts of
Nature. So we may assert that modern discoveries in physiology
have rendered obsolete the Osirian conceptions of the sexual
process which interpreted chastity as physical abstinence, small
regard being paid to the mental and moral concomitants of the
refusal to act, still less to the physical indications. The root of the
error lies in the dogma of original sin, as a result of which pollu
tion was actually excused as being in the nature of involuntary
offence, just as if one were to assert that a sleepwalker who has
fallen over a precipice were any less dead than Empedocles or
Sappho.
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 6528ce4d28e01eb80a128d9c:p00058
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.