1996 · CLOSE READING
The Law is for All
The Law is for All (1996), PDF p. 56
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
Chapter I a Verse 51
57
Hitherto our sexual tabus have kept far ahead of Gilbert and
Sullivan. We have made love the lackey to property, as who
should pay his rent by sneezing. We have swaddled it in polite
ness, as who should warn God off the grass.
We have muddled it up with morality, as who should frown at
the Himalayas on the one hand, and, on the other, regulate his
behaviour by that of an ant-heap.
The Law of Thelema is here!
(It appears pertinent to add that the above ethical theories
have stood the test of practice. Experiment shows that complete
removal—in the most radical manner—of all the usual restric
tions on conduct results, after a brief period of uneasiness of var
ious kinds, in the subject dropping entirely into the background;
the parties concerned became natural, and led what would con
ventionally be called “strictly moral” lives without even knowing
that they were doing so.)
As a Postscript, let me contrast with the above theories two
actual cases of Marriage as it is in England.
No. 1. Mr. W., a solicitor and gentleman farmer of consider
able wealth: a Plymouth Brother. Called, in Southsea, Hants.,
where he practiced: “The Honest Lawyer.” Every time that
his wife gave birth to a child, or miscarried, she lay for
weeks—often months—between life and death, with peri
typhlitis or peritonitis set up by the difficulties of parturition.
Yet this man, knowing this well, had gone on and on
remorselessly. When I knew him he had 18 children living,
and two more were born during that period. It was evidently
his view that he had an absolute Right to impregnate his
wife, and that it was her business whether she lived or died.
During all these years she was no sooner well enough to leave
her bed than she was again “in the family way.” Thus in 25
years, she was never permitted so much as a month’s good
health. This Mr. W. was a most kindly and genial man,
devoted to her and his family, genuinely pious and tender
hearted. But it never occurred to him to refrain from exercis
ing the Right which he possessed to endanger her life every
year. (He suffered intensely with anxiety for his wife’s health.)
No. 2. Mr. H., a very skilful engraver and die-sinker, a man
of refined tastes and delicate feelings, sensitive beyond the
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 6528ce4d28e01eb80a128d9c:p00056
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.