1996 · CLOSE READING
The Law is for All
The Law is for All (1996), PDF p. 25
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
26
The Law is for All
This theory is the only one which explains why the Absolute
limited Itself, and why It does not recognize Itself during Its cycle
of incarnations. It disposes of “Evil” and the Origin of Evil, with
out denying Reality to “Evil,” or insulting our daily observation
and our common sense.
I here quote (with one or two elucidatory insertions) the note
originally made by Me on this subject.
May 14, 1919, 6:30 p.m.
All elements must at one time have been separate—that
would be the case with great heat. Now when the atoms get
to the Sun, when we get to the Sun, we get that immense,
extreme heat, and all the elements are themselves again.
Imagine that each atom of each element possesses the mem
ory of all his adventures in combination. By the way, that
atom, fortified with that memory, would not be the same
atom; yet it is, because it has gained nothing from anywhere
except this memory. Therefore, by the lapse of time, and by
virtue of memory, a thing (although originally an Infinite Per
fection) could become something more than itself; and thus a
real development is possible. One can then see a reason for
any element deciding to go through this series of incarnations
(God, that was a magnificent conception!) because so, and
only so, can he go; and he suffers the lapse of memory of His
own Reality of Perfection which he has during these incarna
tions, because he knows he will come through unchanged.
Therefore you have an infinite number of gods, individual
and equal though diverse, each one supreme and utterly inde
structible. This is also the only explanation of how a Being
could create a world in which War, Evil, etc., exist. Evil is
only an appearance because, (like “Good”) it cannot affect
the substance itself, but only multiply its combinations. This
is something the same as Mystic Monism, but the objection
to that theory is that God has to create things which are all
parts of Himself, so that their interplay is false. If we presup
pose many elements, their interplay is natural. It is no objec
tion to this theory to ask who made the elements—the
elements are at least there; and God, when you look for him,
is not there. Theism is obscurum per obscurius) A male star
is built up from the centre outwards, a female star from the
1 [Lat., “Explaining the obscure by the more obscure.”]
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 6528ce4d28e01eb80a128d9c:p00025
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.