484
Lest any reader should seek to emulate these efforts and meet with disappointment, let me warn 
him of two common factors of failure: 
1. People of unfamiliar races manifest the astrological appearance of their ethnological branch and 
this masks that due to their nativity. Experience enables one to penetrate the superficial indication. 
2. The skill required to judge this matter develops with surprising speed as soon as a certain point 
has been reached. It is best to proceed systematically by asking oneself, first of all, to what 
element the examinee belongs. It is then simple to discriminate between the three possible signs. 
One might mistake Taurus and Scorpio, Gemini and Sagittarius, but the three signs of any given 
element are always distinguishable as easily as a child, an adult and an old man. 
Some signs are almost unmistakable from the first. But others are so weak in character that their 
influence is rarely found unmodified by planetary considerations. One must further remark that 
each sign governs two main 
{763} 
types --- the active and the passive. Thus Aries: the high brows, long face, aquiline nose, tall thin 
muscular figure, shows the fiery and martial qualities of the sign. But there is an evil and averse 
counterpart corresponding to the ovine nature. We have the gross, hooked, pendulous proboscis; 
the thick, flabby, moist lips; the patient stupid eyes, and timid, hunted gait of the bad type of Jew. 
Thanks to the resolute refusal of even the educated astrologer to adopt scientific methods of study, 
their contemptuous indifference to the attitude of the recognized sciences towards them, and their 
adhesion to tradition, in the right interpretation of which they seek authority, rather than in the 
indications of critically analysed experience, the general ignorance of the subject is as great as 
ever. 
I propose to demonstrate once for all the truth of the proposition, that the aspect of the heavens at 
the time of birth is connected with the observed characteristics of the native by collecting a large 
number of photographs, full face and profile for each subject, and classifying them according to the 
horoscope. I will thus have twelve sets, one for each sign ascending, twelve showing the possible 
positions of the sun. I should also examine the assertion that people with Mars rising have some scar 
or other abnormality on the face, by collecting the photographs of such people. Again, Saturn in the 
ascendant is said to give a melancholy cast to the countenance. 
Should it, then, appear that one hundred Aries men showed a marked and characteristic difference 
from one hundred Taurus men, and so on through the zodiac, physicists would be hard put to it to 
deny some nexus. The apparatus criticus should, of course, be very perfect. Complications of the 
ascendant by the presence of planets must be considered separately. Their failure to manifest the 
characteristic appearance of the sign ought not to be considered fatal to the theory. 
Where the history of the subject is available it would furnish material for much further research. 
We would discover, for instance, whether the presence of Saturn in the seventh house invariably 
concurred with matrimonial misfortune, or in the tenth with rapid rise of fortunes followed by a 
sudden crash as in the case of Napoleon, Oscar Wilde, Woodrow Wilson, Lord Northcliffe and several 
private cases in my own collection. The labour required for this research would be enormous, but 
the bulk of it would be done by ordinary clerks. And as for the preliminary difficulty of collecting 
material, any great newspaper could carry out the scheme easily enough. It would of course be 
necessary to publish an explanation of the proposal with a questionnaire covering the principal 
points, and asking for good photographs to be sent with the filled up form. 
One final remark. I found myself able, as my experience increased, to divine not only the rising sign 
and the position of the sun, but both points 
{764}