1939 · CLOSE READING
Eight Lectures on Yoga
Eight Lectures on Yoga (1939), PDF p. 16
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
combine enthusiastically with hydrogen, and only in a very surly way with
oxygen. It is not virtuous of a hydra to be hermaphrodite, or
contumacious on the part of an elbow not to move freely in all directions.
Anybody who knows what his job is has only one duty, which is to get
that job done. Anyone who possesses a function has only one duty to that
function, to arrange for its free fulfilment.
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
8. We shall not be surprised therefore if we find that the perfectly
simple term Yama (or Control) has been bedevilled out of all sense by the
mistaken and malignant ingenuity of the pious Hindu. He has interpreted
the word 'control' as meaning compliance with certain fixed proscriptions.
There are quite a lot of prohibitions grouped under the heading of Yama,
which are perhaps quite necessary for the kind of people contemplated by
the Teacher, but they have been senselessly elevated into universal rules.
Everyone is familiar with the prohibition of pork as an article of diet by
Jews and Mohammedans. This has nothing to do with Yama, or abstract
righteousness. It was due to the fact that pork in eastern countries was
infected with the trichina; which killed people who ate pork improperly
cooked. It was no good telling the savages that fact. Any way, they would
only have broken the hygienic command when greed overcame them. The
advice had to be made a universal rule, and supported with the authority
of a religious sanction. They had not the brains to believe in trichinosis;
but they were afraid of Jehovah and Jehannum. Just so, under the
grouping of Yama we learn that the aspiring Yogi must become 'fixed in
the non-receiving of gifts,' which means that if anyone offers you a
cigarette or a drink of water, you must reject his insidious advances in the
most Victorian manner. It is such nonsense as this which brings the
science of Yoga into contempt. But it isn't nonsense if you consider the
class of people for whom the injunction was promulgated; for, as we will
be shown later, preliminary to the concentration of the mind is the control
of the mind, which means the calm of the mind, and the Hindu mind is so
constituted that if you offer a man the most trifling object, the incident is
a landmark in his life. It upsets him completely for years.
In the East, an absolutely automatic and thoughtless act of kindness
to a native is liable to attach him to you, body and soul, for the rest of his
life. In other words, it is going to upset him; and as a budding Yogi he has
got to refuse it. But even the refusal is going to upset him quite a lot; and
therefore he has got to become 'fixed' in refusal; that is to say, he has
got to erect by means of habitual refusal a psychological barrier so strong
that he can really dismiss the temptation without a quiver, or a quaver, or
even a demisemiquaver of thought. I am sure you will see that an
absolute rule is necessary to obtain this result. It is obviously impossible
for him to try to draw the line between what he may receive and what he
may not; he is merely involved in a Socratic dilemma; whereas if he goes
to the other end of the line and accepts everything, his mind is equally
upset by the burden of the responsibility of dealing with the things he has
accepted. However, all these considerations do not apply to the average
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 11ea06f5df920a5b4a5d7e16:p00016
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.