Thelema ScholarTHE ALEISTER CROWLEY COLLECTION
← The Equinox (Volume I, Number X)
1913 · CLOSE READING

The Equinox (Volume I, Number X)

The Equinox (Volume I, Number X) (1913), PDF p. 303

Original page

Enlarge ↗
Original scan of The Equinox (Volume I, Number X), PDF page 303

Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.

Transcription

Download text ↓
raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
THE KEY OF THE MYSTERIES qué priest, is always the representative of God. Of little account are the faults or even the crimes of man. When Alexander VI consecrated his bishops, it was not the poisoner who laid his hands upon them, it was the pope. Pope Alexander VI never corrupted or falsified the dogmas which condemned him, or the sacraments which in his hands saved others, and did not justify him. At all times and in all places there have been liars and criminals, but in the hierarchical and divinely authorized Church there have never been, and there will never be, either bad popes or bad priests. “Bad” and “ priest” form an oxymoron. We have mentioned Alexander VI, and we think that this name will be sufficient without other memories as justly execrated as his being brought up against us. Great criminals have been able to dishonour themselves doubly because of the sacred character with which they were invested, but they had not the power to dishonour that character, which remains always radiant and splendid above fallen humanity. We have said that there is no religion without mysteries; let us add that there are no mysteries without symbols. The symbol, being the formula or the expression of the mystery, only expresses its unknown depth by paradoxical images borrowed from the known. The symbolic form, having for its object to characterize what is above scientific reason, should necessarily find itself without that reason: hence the celebrated and perfectly just remark of a Father of the Church: “I believe because it is absurd. Credo guia absurdum.” If science were to affirm what it did not know, it would 1 A dog has six legs. Definition. It is no answer to this to show that all dogs have four.—O. M. 5
Page provenance & review flags

Stable page ID: 055db0b9f9f14b4b534ea050:p00303

Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.

Printed page label has not been verified.

  • No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.